What does it mean to be “well-adjusted” in a society that might itself be profoundly unwell? And when we use therapy-speak to explain everything from bad relationships to bad politics, do we risk losing sight of moral responsibility for bad behavior altogether? Is self-knowledge even possible in a world built on historical and political denial?
Grab a drink, get comfortable, and join us for a little collective introspection — no copay required.
This week’s jukebox picks:
- Jen’s pick: “Burn the House Down” by AJR
- Bob’s pick: “ Therapy” by Louden Wainwright, III
- Leigh’s pick: “Happy” by Pherrell Williams
In this episode, we reference the following thinkers, ideas, texts, etc:
- On the recent popular uptake of Stoicism (See also our Season 7 conversation with Robin James on this topic in Episode 197: “How the Manosphere Killed Cool”)
- Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (167 C.E.)
- Sigmund Freud
- Archbishop Desmond Tutu
- “pop psychology”
- borderline personality disorder (DSM-5)
- Katy Waldman, “The Rise of Therapy Speak” (New York Times, 2021)
- Michel Foucault, Technologies of the Self (1988)
- Plato, Symposium
- Audre Lorde, A Burst of Light: Essays (1988)
- “group therapy”
- “self-care”
- Henry Kissinger: “Academic politics are so vicious because the stakes are so small.”
- Coping mechanisms
- National Philosophical Counseling Association (US)
- Samir Chopra (and Chopra’s conversation with Leigh on the Black Mirror Reflections podcast, Episode 13: “Be Right Back”)
- Depression
- Hermeneutics
academia American politics Andrew Tate communal ethics community consciousness coping mechanisms culture Desmond Tutu disability DSM ethics Freud identity insurance Jordan Peterson Lacan medical care mental health neurodiversity Nick Fuentes pathology pop psychology popular culture psychoanaly. psychiatry psychoanalysis psychology responsibility self-help social media social theory Stoicism structuralism therapy therapy speak Trump